2017 Legislative Agenda







From: The National Federation of the Blind of Missouri


Date: February 13 & 14, 2017



The National Federation of the Blind knows that blindness is not the characteristic that defines you or your future. Every day we raise the expectations of blind people, because low expectations create obstacles between blind people and their dreams. Blindness is not what holds us back.


This is the message we bring to blind Missourians and the communities we live in. We pledge to be a resource to you and your constituents when they turn to you for help.


The National Federation of the Blind is a membership organization of and for the blind. As a volunteer grassroots organization, we are blind people working on behalf of blind people. We come together on the local, state, and national level to address issues of importance to our fellow blind citizens. We promote programs that encourage self-determination, independence, and equality of opportunity.



Why a Research-Based, Standardized Reading Media Assessment Is Needed


The desirability of learning to read efficiently has never been a question in your education. Not so if one is blind. The equivalent of print for the sighted is Braille for the blind, and this is recognized in the education laws of Missouri in RSMo 167.225. Though the law says that no blind person shall be denied instruction in Braille, it does allow school districts to conduct evaluations to determine whether print or Braille is the most appropriate method for reading and writing for a given student. Far too often print is determined to be the most appropriate reading medium because the process used in making evaluations is flawed and because the strong preference of teachers and school administrators is to teach what they know and use the resources easily available to them.


The consequences for blind students are devastating. Blind people who can see enough to read some print require that it be enlarged. In the early grades this is how it is presented, but when learning to read is replaced by reading to learn, the print gets smaller and the amount of it that one must read gets larger.


It is common practice for students with visual impairments to hold reading materials very close to their faces, and/or to hunch their bodies over the materials when reading. In addition to the posture and other health concerns these reading positions raise, years of field practice and experience have demonstrated that youth who read print materials at very close distances suffer eye strain, headache, neck and back pain, fatigue, and diminished concentration, reading speed, and comprehension. Consequently, any valid assessment should ensure that children are evaluated when sitting up straight and with materials held or placed at standardized distances.


Senate Bill 362 introduced by Senator Jacob Hummel is designed to modify Missouri's statutes so that Section 167.225 mandates the use of the National Reading Media Assessment (NRMA) or another research-based assessment. Knowing the resistance we have seen from special education administrators, we firmly believe that adding “standardized” to the definition of assessment to be of great importance. We know hundreds of adults and many children who have been denied the opportunity of learning Braille. A research-based, standardized assessment could have avoided their education being compromised. Our state must have a clear standard which is both reliable and valid to use in determining who will be taught print, who will be taught Braille and when both print and Braille are appropriate. Bringing blind people into the workforce demands this change as 80% of employed blind people read Braille. We urge the Missouri General Assembly to embrace literacy for the blind with the same vigor that our society embraces literacy for the sighted.



Accessible Voting In All Elections


The Help America Vote Act (HAVA) recognizes the right of the blind to vote privately and independently by requiring nonvisual access for the blind through the use of accessible voting systems in all federal elections. Electronic voting technologies, designed and properly configured with nonvisual access, provide blind voters with the ability to cast their votes privately and independently and to verify, without sighted assistance, that their ballots accurately reflect their voting choices. Electronic voting systems were certified and purchased, and Missouri received federal funds for each polling place to provide at least one accessible voting machine. All certified machines in Missouri provide a paper trail.


The Missouri Secretary of State’s Office is evaluating newer machines that mark directly onto the paper ballot. The options are there if legislation is passed to make the paper ballot the official ballot of Missouri and as the existing machines need to be replaced, the technology will be available. The accessible machines are already required for the state to comply with HAVA. Some election boards may set these machines up more frequently than others. We ask that they be used consistently in all elections. The cost of setting them up should be minimal as “text to speech” options are available. Concerted effort is made to get voters to the polls; Missouri should assure that when they arrive they have the means to cast their ballots privately and independently.


Beyond the example and financial assistance HAVA has provided to emphasize accessible voting, there are two federal laws that require all elections to be accessible to bring Missouri into compliance with federal laws.


Voters with disabilities have the same right to vote privately and independently as do voters without disabilities. When accessible voting machines are not present in state, county and municipal elections, blind, visually impaired, and other print disabled voters are denied an equal opportunity to cast their ballot privately and independently. This is a violation of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. As a recipient of federal funds, Missouri and our Election Boards are required to comply with Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act.


Additionally, the Americans with Disabilities Act guarantees equal access for individuals with disabilities to the benefits of the services, programs, or activities of a public entity. Public entities must provide individuals with disabilities an aid, benefit, or service, that is as effective in affording equal opportunity to gain the same result or benefit as provided to others. Public entities shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to afford individuals with disabilities an equal opportunity to participate in and enjoy the benefits of a service, program, or activity of a public entity. To be effective, the auxiliary aids and services must be provided in such a way as to protect the privacy and independence of the individual with a disability.


Whether the financial responsibility falls on the State of Missouri or the County Election Boards, is a technicality that must not continue to be at the expense of blind, visually impaired or other disabled individuals that could benefit from use of accessible voting equipment. Please help pass HB 520 and grant disabled voters the opportunity and the right afforded us to have the same privilege in every election as you value.



Required Identification to Purchase Alcohol


The National Federation of the Blind worked hard to get Missouri to establish a non-driver’s license to meet the need for valid identification for Missourians who are unable to drive, and, when that form of identification still was not accepted as a valid identification because it did not have an expiration date, we went back to the legislature to advocate that an expiration date be added to the non-driver’s license, thus requiring renewal and keeping it current. Therefore, we were concerned when a thirty-five year old blind chemist, business owner, and a former professor with a PhD in chemistry came to Missouri on business, and an establishment in St. Joseph refused to sell him a drink. Significant business often transpires over drinks and dinner. Imagine the awkwardness this situation would create and the way such discrimination could impact the impression that somehow the blind person is different, maybe less responsible. This individual did have a valid non-driver’s license which was not expired from the state where he resides, but an obvious omission in current law does not acknowledge the non-drivers identification issued by another state.


When this discriminatory action came to our attention, we researched Missouri law to determine how this could happen in our state. We learned that the applicable state statute actually lists the required forms of identification that are accepted as valid identification to verify age when purchasing alcohol. While it included our Missouri non-driver’s license and an out-of-state driver’s license, it did not include an out-of-state non-driver’s license. Therefore, we have been advised by a lawyer and by the office of Missouri’s Attorney General that changing this practice will require legislation amending Missouri Statute 311.328, which states “the valid forms of identification are a Missouri driver's license, a Missouri issued non-driver identification card, a valid driver's license issued by any other state, [a valid non-driver's license issued by any other state,] a military identification, or a passport. Servers are further allowed to limit the forms of identification they accept by not accepting military ID's or passports.”


We trust that this language in the statute is a matter of omission and not an intentional decision. Whether intentional or merely an oversite, this statute permits a server or store owner to discriminate against blind people who may visit Missouri or who may be planning to bring business to Missouri. Let’s make this a welcoming state by introducing legislation to amend this statute. Our suggested language appears above with the wording in brackets. Will you help with this issue?